FirePro M6100 vs FirePro W7100
In this comparison between FirePro M6100 and FirePro W7100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M6100 will be the best choice, for others FirePro W7100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6100 | FirePro W7100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and FirePro W7100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro M6100.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and FirePro W7100 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro W7100 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 180 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
- FirePro M6100 and FirePro W7100 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 175% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than FirePro M6100. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6100 | FirePro W7100 | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Bonaire | Tonga |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2013 | 12 August 2014 |
Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 920 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 103.0 |
Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 3,297 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | 362 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |