FirePro W7100 vs FireStream 9370
In this comparison between FirePro W7100 and FireStream 9370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7100 will be the best choice, for others FireStream 9370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | FireStream 9370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DisplayPort |
- FirePro W7100 has 77% more power consumption, than FireStream 9370.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and FireStream 9370 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and FireStream 9370 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 95 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9370 - by 40 nm process technology.
- FireStream 9370 is 26 mm longer, than FirePro W7100.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 128% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | FireStream 9370 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Tonga | Cypress |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 23 June 2010 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,154 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 66.00 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 147.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB