FirePro W7100 vs GeForce 945M
In this comparison between FirePro W7100 and GeForce 945M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 945M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7100
GeForce 945M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 945M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 945M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | GeForce 945M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 433% more power consumption, than GeForce 945M.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 945M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce 945M.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 945M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce 945M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 945M is 8 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
- FirePro W7100 and GeForce 945M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 3000 MHz higher, than GeForce 945M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 227% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 244% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 168% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than GeForce 945M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce 945M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | GeForce 945M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tonga | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 12 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 928 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1045 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 953.9 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | 107 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |