FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GT 645M
When comparing FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 645M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 645M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W7100
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 1150% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7100 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 645M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 645M - with Kepler.
- FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 645M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 645M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 645M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1360% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tonga | N13P-GS |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 22.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 544.5 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | 19 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- FirePro W7100 vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX