FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GT 650M
When choosing between FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 650M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 650M.
FirePro W7100
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | GeForce GT 650M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 788% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7100 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 650M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 650M - with Kepler.
- FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 650M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7100 and GeForce GT 650M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 176% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 105% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 383% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 257% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 46% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce GT 650M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | GeForce GT 650M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tonga | N13E-GE |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 - 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | 21 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |