FirePro W7100 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
When comparing FirePro W7100 and Iris Plus Graphics 640, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7100 and Iris Plus Graphics 640 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W7100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 2566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 24 GB more memory, than FirePro W7100.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 620 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 640 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 277% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | Tonga | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.103 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M