FirePro W7100 vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When comparing FirePro W7100 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7100 and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W7100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 2566% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 620 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 201% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 139% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 571% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 363% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 304% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 142% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | Tonga | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.80 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- FirePro W7100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2