FirePro W7100 vs Quadro K3100M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W7100 and Quadro K3100M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W7100 stacks up against Quadro K3100M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W7100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro K3100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3100M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Quadro K3100M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 433% more power consumption, than Quadro K3100M.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3100M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 4 GB more memory, than Quadro K3100M.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3100M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro K3100M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 214 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
- FirePro W7100 and Quadro K3100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K3100M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 210% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 213% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 155% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than Quadro K3100M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Quadro K3100M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Quadro K3100M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tonga | N15E-Q1-A2 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 706 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 45.18 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 1,084 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | 44 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |