FirePro W7100 vs Quadro P3200
When choosing between FirePro W7100 and Quadro P3200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7100 and Quadro P3200.
FirePro W7100
Quadro P3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P3200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6084 MB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
| Check Price |
- Quadro P3200 has 6076 GB more memory, than FirePro W7100.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro P3200 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 212 MHz higher, than Quadro P3200.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P3200 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P3200 is 2008 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 9% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| FirePro W7100 and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro W7100 and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| FirePro W7100 and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Fortnite is 7% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| FirePro W7100 and Quadro P3200 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P3200 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Quadro P3200 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | Tonga | N18E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2014 | 27 February 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 708 - 1202 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1228 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 103.0 | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |