FirePro W7100 vs Quadro P500
In this comparison between FirePro W7100 and Quadro P500 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7100 will be the best choice, for others Quadro P500 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Quadro P500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 1233% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7100 has 6 GB more memory, than Quadro P500.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 535 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 12 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 113% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 76% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 229% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 293% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 416% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 313% more, than Quadro P500. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro P500. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Quadro P500 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Tonga | GP108 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 14 November 2017 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 21.25 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.0.1 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |