FirePro W7100 vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W7100 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W7100 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W7100
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2x2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 240 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 4100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7100 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W7100 and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 64% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 49% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | Tonga | Blackcomb XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 680 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2x1700 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- FirePro W7100 vs FirePro S9050
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire vs FirePro S9050