FirePro W7100 vs Radeon HD 8750M
When choosing between FirePro W7100 and Radeon HD 8750M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7100 and Radeon HD 8750M.
FirePro W7100
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- FirePro W7100 and Radeon HD 8750M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7100 and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro W7100 and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN |
Code name | Tonga | Mars Pro |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 16 November 2012 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 620 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 18.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | 71 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |