FirePro W7100 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
When choosing between FirePro W7100 and Radeon Pro WX 3200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7100 and Radeon Pro WX 3200.
FirePro W7100
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 515% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 162 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Polaris |
| Code name | Tonga | Polaris 12 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 12 August 2014 | 26 September 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1082 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 41.44 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |