FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W7100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W7100 stacks up against Radeon R5 430 OEM, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W7100
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Main Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
- FirePro W7100 has 700% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 190 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- FirePro W7100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 400 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 787% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| FirePro W7100 and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 221% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro W7100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 480% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 775% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 322% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | Oland |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 August 2014 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |