FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M365X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W7100 and Radeon R9 M365X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W7100 and Radeon R9 M365X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W7100
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 20 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- FirePro W7100 and Radeon R9 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 277% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M365X | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN |
| Code name | Tonga | Tropo |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 August 2014 | 6 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- Radeon R9 M365X vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- Radeon R9 M365X vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs Iris Graphics 6100
- FirePro W7100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Iris Graphics 6100
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870