FirePro W7100 vs Radeon R9 M395X
When comparing FirePro W7100 and Radeon R9 M395X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7100 and Radeon R9 M395X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W7100
Radeon R9 M395X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395X here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 60% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395X - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M395X - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 197 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
- FirePro W7100 and Radeon R9 M395X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 3750 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7100 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 240−250 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 180−190 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W7100 and Radeon R9 M395X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon R9 M395X. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Radeon R9 M395X | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Tonga | Amethyst XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 16 October 2014 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | 413 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |