FirePro W7100 vs Radeon RX 460

In this comparison between FirePro W7100 and Radeon RX 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon RX 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W7100

Radeon RX 460 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W7100	Radeon RX 460
Power consumption (TDP)	400 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
		Check Price

FirePro W7100 has 433% more power consumption, than Radeon RX 460.
FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon RX 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro W7100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon RX 460.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon RX 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 170 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon RX 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
FirePro W7100 is 71 mm longer, than Radeon RX 460.
Memory clock speed of Radeon RX 460 is 2000 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	12−14
QHD / 1440p	16−18	7−8
4K / 2160p	10−11	5−6
low / 720p	60−65	40−45
medium / 1080p	40−45	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p	55−60	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	35−40	12−14
4K / 2160p	18−20	8−9
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	60−65	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W7100 and Radeon RX 460 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	230−240
medium / 768p	220−230	200−210
ultra / 1080p	180−190	120−130
QHD / 1440p	110−120	95−100
4K / 2160p	70−75	50−55
high / 768p	210−220	170−180
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro W7100 and Radeon RX 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	80−85
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p	45−50	24−27
ultra / 1080p	40−45	24−27
QHD / 1440p	27−30	20−22
4K / 2160p	14−16	8−9
low / 720p	80−85	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 65% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	27−30	16−18
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	45−50	27−30
QHD / 1440p	30−35	14−16
4K / 2160p	24−27	12−14
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	65−70	40−45
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 64% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p	140−150	100−110
medium / 768p	120−130	95−100
high / 1080p	70−75	40−45
ultra / 1080p	30−35	16−18
QHD / 1440p	21−24	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 49% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	20−22	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	10−11
4K / 2160p	8−9	3−4
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	30−35	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p	130−140	120−130
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon RX 460.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	70−75
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon RX 460.
high / 1080p	24−27	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−11
QHD / 1440p	10−11	2−3
4K / 2160p	7−8	1−2
low / 720p	65−70	40−45
medium / 1080p	35−40	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p	130−140	75−80
medium / 768p	85−90	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
4K / 2160p	16−18	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 82% more, than Radeon RX 460.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon RX 460.

Full Specs

	FirePro W7100	Radeon RX 460
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Polaris
Code name	Tonga	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 August 2014	8 August 2016
Pipelines	1792	896
Core clock speed	920 MHz	1090 MHz
Boost Clock		1200 MHz
Transistor count	5,000 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	103.0	67.20
Floating-point performance	3,297 gflops	2,150 gflops
Length	241 mm	170 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	362 Mh/s	240 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
		Check Price

FirePro W7100 vs Radeon RX 460

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares