FirePro W7100 vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between FirePro W7100 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7100 will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7100
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7100 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 55% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W7100 and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 117% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 169% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | Tonga | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 950
- FirePro W7100 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100