FirePro V5800 vs FirePro W7170M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and FirePro W7170M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against FirePro W7170M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | FirePro W7170M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7170M has 35% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and FirePro W7170M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and FirePro W7170M - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and FirePro W7170M - with GCN 3.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 33 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and FirePro W7170M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 142% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 128% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 216% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 207% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | FirePro W7170M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 3 |
Code name | Juniper | Tonga |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 723 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 92.54 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,961 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |