FirePro W7170M vs FireStream 9370
When comparing FirePro W7170M and FireStream 9370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7170M and FireStream 9370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | FireStream 9370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 125% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and FireStream 9370 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W7170M and FireStream 9370 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9370 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and FireStream 9370 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 102 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9370 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 52% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 22% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 52% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 42% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 14% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | FireStream 9370 | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Tonga | Cypress |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 23 June 2010 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 2,154 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 66.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 147.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon HD 7850
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 7850
- FirePro W7170M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FirePro W7170M vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB