FirePro W7170M vs GeForce GTS 160M
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTS 160M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTS 160M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTS 160M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTS 160M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M or GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M
GeForce GTS 160M
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
60 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W7170M has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTS 160M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 777 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 160M - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
0−1
ultra / 1080p
12−14
−
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
1−2
medium / 1080p
24−27
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
27−30
−
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
0−1
medium / 1080p
35−40
−
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
60−65
medium / 768p
200−210
27−30
ultra / 1080p
110−120
7−8
QHD / 1440p
85−90
−
4K / 2160p
45−50
−
high / 768p
160−170
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
60−65
70−75
ultra / 1080p
50−55
0−1
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
45−50
medium / 768p
100−110
10−11
ultra / 1080p
75−80
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 296% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
50−55
0−1
medium / 1080p
24−27
−
high / 1080p
30−35
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
21−24
medium / 1080p
70−75
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 468% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
30−35
0−1
ultra / 1080p
24−27
−
QHD / 1440p
12−14
0−1
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
0−1
medium / 1080p
35−40
0−1
low / 768p
100−110
18−20
medium / 768p
90−95
−
high / 1080p
40−45
0−1
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 768p
120−130
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 62% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
70−75
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
20−22
−
low / 768p
70−75
0−1
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
24−27
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
60−65
14−16
ultra / 1080p
40−45
0−1
high / 768p
55−60
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M
GeForce GTS 160M
Architecture
GCN 3
G9x
Code name
Tonga
N10E-GS1
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
2 October 2015
2 March 2009
Pipelines
2048
64
Core clock speed
723 MHz
1500 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
505 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
92.54
19 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
2,961 gflops
192 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
51 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
6.3
4.0
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
large
Eyefinity
+
AppAcceleration
+
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price