FirePro W7170M vs GeForce GTX 285
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTX 285 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 285 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M
GeForce GTX 285
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
204 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 104% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 285 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285.
FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 285 - in Desktops.
FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GeForce GTX 285 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285 is 753 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 285 - by 55 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 3758 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
16−18
medium / 1080p
24−27
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
27−30
10−11
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
24−27
medium / 1080p
35−40
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
230−240
140−150
medium / 768p
200−210
110−120
ultra / 1080p
110−120
55−60
QHD / 1440p
85−90
30−35
4K / 2160p
45−50
27−30
high / 768p
160−170
85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
20−22
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
120−130
80−85
medium / 768p
100−110
60−65
ultra / 1080p
75−80
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
24−27
8−9
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
20−22
medium / 1080p
24−27
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 160% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
30−35
14−16
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−12
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
60−65
medium / 1080p
70−75
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−12
QHD / 1440p
12−14
1−2
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 169% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
100−110
55−60
medium / 768p
90−95
45−50
high / 1080p
40−45
12−14
ultra / 1080p
16−18
6−7
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 171% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
120−130
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
90−95
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
30−35
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
7−8
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
20−22
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
70−75
24−27
medium / 768p
45−50
16−18
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
14−16
6−7
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
20−22
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M
GeForce GTX 285
Architecture
GCN 3
Tesla 2.0
Code name
Tonga
GT200B
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
2 October 2015
23 December 2008
Pipelines
2048
240
Core clock speed
723 MHz
1476 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
92.54
51.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
2,961 gflops
708.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
512 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
159.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
6.3
4.0
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
240
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
AppAcceleration
+
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Check Price
Check Price
