FirePro W7170M vs GeForce GTX 295
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTX 295, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and GeForce GTX 295.
GeForce GTX 295
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 6-pin & 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 189% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 519 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 4001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 285% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 275% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tonga | GT200B |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |