FirePro W7170M vs GRID K160Q
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and GRID K160Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and GRID K160Q.
GRID K160Q
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 30% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 127 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 520% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7170M and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 178% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 155% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 875% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 326% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1533% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tonga | GK107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |