FirePro W7170M vs GRID K220Q
When comparing FirePro W7170M and GRID K220Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7170M and GRID K220Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID K220Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 125% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K220Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GRID K220Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 22 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and GRID K220Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M and GRID K220Q is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 460% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7170M and GRID K220Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 293% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 462% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 1000% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 860% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID K220Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tonga | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 2 July 2014 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |