FirePro W7170M vs GRID K520
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and GRID K520, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and GRID K520.
GRID K520
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 125% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 22 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M and GRID K520 is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 17% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| FirePro W7170M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tonga | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |