FirePro W7170M vs GRID M60 1Q
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and GRID M60 1Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 1Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 1Q
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 1Q has 125% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID M60 1Q.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID M60 1Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GRID M60 1Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 166 MHz higher, than GRID M60 1Q.
- FirePro W7170M and GRID M60 1Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 1Q is 12 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7170M and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro W7170M and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Dota 2 is 4% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Fortnite is 9% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| FirePro W7170M and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 1Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro W7170M and GRID M60 1Q have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID M60 1Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | GM204 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 557 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 150.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |