FirePro W7170M vs Quadro CX
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and Quadro CX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and Quadro CX.
Quadro CX
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Quadro CX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1536 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro CX has 50% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro CX uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro CX has 1532 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro CX - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Quadro CX - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 121 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro CX - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 460% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7170M and Quadro CX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 121% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 293% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 462% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 1000% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than Quadro CX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro CX. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Quadro CX | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Tonga | GT200B |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 11 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 602 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 38.53 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon HD 7850
- Quadro CX vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7850
- FirePro W7170M vs GeForce GT 645M
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics
- Quadro CX vs GeForce GT 645M
- Quadro CX vs Radeon HD 7660G plus HD 7670M Dual Graphics