Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro W7170M vs Quadro K3000M

    When comparing FirePro W7170M and Quadro K3000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7170M and Quadro K3000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
    FirePro W7170M Check Price
    Quadro K3000M Check Price

    FirePro W7170M and Quadro K3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

    Note: FirePro W7170M and Quadro K3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M or Quadro K3000M here:

    FirePro W7170M Laptops
    Quadro K3000M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro W7170M Quadro K3000M
    Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
    Supplementary power connectors None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro W7170M has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
    • FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
    • FirePro W7170M and Quadro K3000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
    • Both cards are used in Laptops.
    • FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
    • Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 69 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
    • FirePro W7170M and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 20−22 7−8
    ultra / 1080p 12−14 4−5
    QHD / 1440p 6−7 0−1
    4K / 2160p 5−6 −
    low / 720p 35−40 18−20
    medium / 1080p 24−27 9−10
    The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Quadro K3000M.

    Full Specs

      FirePro W7170M Quadro K3000M
    Architecture GCN 3 Kepler
    Code name Tonga N14E-Q1
    Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation
    Release date 2 October 2015 1 June 2012
    Pipelines 2048 576
    Core clock speed 723 MHz 654 MHz
    Transistor count 5,000 million 3,540 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 92.54 31.39
    Floating-point performance 2,961 gflops 753.4 gflops
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 2800 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
    Shared memory - -
    DirectX 12 (12_0) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 6.3 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 2.0 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.1.126
    CUDA +
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 24 Mh/s
    Laptop size large large
    Optimus +
    Eyefinity +
    AppAcceleration +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares