FirePro W7170M vs Quadro K4200
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and Quadro K4200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M
Quadro K4200
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
108 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro K4200 has 8% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K4200 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro W7170M and Quadro K4200 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro K4200 - in Desktops.
FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Quadro K4200 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 48 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
FirePro W7170M and Quadro K4200 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K4200 is 400 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
QHD / 1440p
6−7
7−8
4K / 2160p
5−6
5−6
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than FirePro W7170M.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−33
QHD / 1440p
10−12
14−16
4K / 2160p
7−8
9−10
low / 720p
65−70
70−75
medium / 1080p
35−40
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Battlefield 5 is 10% more, than FirePro W7170M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W7170M and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
230−240
medium / 768p
200−210
200−210
ultra / 1080p
110−120
120−130
QHD / 1440p
85−90
100−105
4K / 2160p
45−50
55−60
high / 768p
160−170
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than FirePro W7170M.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
50−55
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
FirePro W7170M and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
75−80
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than FirePro W7170M.
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
18−20
20−22
4K / 2160p
7−8
8−9
low / 720p
50−55
55−60
medium / 1080p
24−27
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
QHD / 1440p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
120−130
130−140
medium / 1080p
70−75
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Fortnite is 9% more, than FirePro W7170M.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
27−30
QHD / 1440p
12−14
16−18
4K / 2160p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
70−75
medium / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M.
low / 768p
100−110
100−110
medium / 768p
90−95
95−100
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
ultra / 1080p
16−18
18−20
QHD / 1440p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than FirePro W7170M.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
FirePro W7170M and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
75−80
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than FirePro W7170M.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−12
QHD / 1440p
1−2
2−3
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
20−22
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than FirePro W7170M.
low / 768p
70−75
80−85
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
24−27
27−30
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
4K / 2160p
8−9
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than FirePro W7170M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
40−45
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
FirePro W7170M and Quadro K4200 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M
Quadro K4200
Architecture
GCN 3
Kepler
Code name
Tonga
GK104
Type
Mobile workstation
Workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
22 July 2014
Pipelines
2048
1344
Core clock speed
723 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
92.54
87.81
Floating-point performance
2,961 gflops
2,107 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
172.8 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
119 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Eyefinity
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
