FirePro W7170M vs Quadro K5000M
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and Quadro K5000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others Quadro K5000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7170M and Quadro K5000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W7170M and Quadro K5000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M or Quadro K5000M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M
Quadro K5000M
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 100 Watt.
FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K5000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
FirePro W7170M and Quadro K5000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Quadro K5000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 17 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
FirePro W7170M and Quadro K5000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro K5000M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
9−10
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
5−6
4−5
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
24−27
20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
27−30
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−12
9−10
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
65−70
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
230−240
210−220
medium / 768p
200−210
180−190
ultra / 1080p
110−120
100−110
QHD / 1440p
85−90
55−60
4K / 2160p
45−50
30−35
high / 768p
160−170
140−150
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
95−100
ultra / 1080p
75−80
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
24−27
18−20
ultra / 1080p
21−24
16−18
QHD / 1440p
18−20
16−18
4K / 2160p
7−8
6−7
low / 720p
50−55
40−45
medium / 1080p
24−27
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
24−27
ultra / 1080p
24−27
20−22
QHD / 1440p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
120−130
100−110
medium / 1080p
70−75
55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
30−35
27−30
ultra / 1080p
24−27
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
10−11
4K / 2160p
12−14
10−11
low / 720p
65−70
55−60
medium / 1080p
35−40
30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
90−95
80−85
high / 1080p
40−45
30−35
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
QHD / 1440p
6−7
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
12−14
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
4K / 2160p
2−3
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
16−18
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 9% more, than Quadro K5000M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
18−20
low / 720p
70−75
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
FirePro W7170M and Quadro K5000M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p
14−16
14−16
ultra / 1080p
10−11
10−11
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
30−35
medium / 1080p
20−22
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
high / 1080p
24−27
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
10−12
4K / 2160p
8−9
8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than Quadro K5000M.
low / 768p
90−95
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K5000M in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FirePro W7170M.
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M
Quadro K5000M
Architecture
GCN 3
Kepler
Code name
Tonga
N14E-Q5
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
1 June 2012
Pipelines
2048
1344
Core clock speed
723 MHz
706 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
92.54
67.31
Floating-point performance
2,961 gflops
1,615 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
6.3
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
51 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Optimus
+
Eyefinity
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price