Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    FirePro W7170M vs Quadro P2000

    In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and Quadro P2000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others Quadro P2000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
    FirePro W7170M Check Price
    Quadro P2000 Check Price

    FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:

    FirePro W7170M Laptops

    Main Specs

      FirePro W7170M Quadro P2000
    Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors None None
    Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 5 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 4x DisplayPort
      Check Price Check Price
    • FirePro W7170M has 33% more power consumption, than Quadro P2000.
    • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
    • Quadro P2000 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
    • FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Quadro P2000 - in Desktops.
    • FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Quadro P2000 - with Pascal.
    • Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 353 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
    • FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 - by 16 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 is 2008 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 20−22 35−40
    ultra / 1080p 12−14 24−27
    QHD / 1440p 6−7 18−20
    4K / 2160p 5−6 10−11
    low / 720p 35−40 60−65
    medium / 1080p 24−27 45−50
    The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than FirePro W7170M.

    Full Specs

      FirePro W7170M Quadro P2000
    Architecture GCN 3 Pascal
    Code name Tonga GP106
    Type Mobile workstation Workstation
    Release date 2 October 2015 6 February 2017
    Pipelines 2048 1024
    Core clock speed 723 MHz 1076 MHz
    Boost Clock 1480 MHz
    Transistor count 5,000 million 4,400 million
    Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 16 nm
    Texture fill rate 92.54 94.72
    Floating-point performance 2,961 gflops 3,031 gflops
    Length 201 mm
    Memory bus width 256 Bit 160 Bit
    Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 7008 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s 140.2 GB/s
    Shared memory -
    DirectX 12 (12_0) 12 (12_1)
    Shader Model 6.3 6.4
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 2.0 1.2
    Vulkan 1.2.131 1.2.131
    CUDA 6.1
    Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.19 kh/s
    Laptop size large
    Eyefinity +
    AppAcceleration +
      Check Price Check Price

    Similar compares