FirePro W7170M vs Quadro P520
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and Quadro P520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others Quadro P520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7170M and Quadro P520 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro W7170M and Quadro P520 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M or Quadro P520 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M
Quadro P520
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro W7170M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro P520.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Quadro P520 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of Quadro P520 is 580 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P520 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro P520 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
10−12
ultra / 1080p
12−14
6−7
QHD / 1440p
6−7
1−2
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
24−27
medium / 1080p
24−27
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 81% more, than Quadro P520.
high / 1080p
30−35
18−20
ultra / 1080p
27−30
14−16
QHD / 1440p
10−12
1−2
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
35−40
medium / 1080p
35−40
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than Quadro P520.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro P520.
low / 768p
230−240
170−180
medium / 768p
200−210
140−150
ultra / 1080p
110−120
75−80
QHD / 1440p
85−90
40−45
4K / 2160p
45−50
30−33
high / 768p
160−170
110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Quadro P520.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
30−33
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro P520.
low / 768p
120−130
95−100
medium / 768p
100−110
75−80
ultra / 1080p
75−80
50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 36% more, than Quadro P520.
high / 1080p
24−27
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
12−14
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
5−6
low / 720p
50−55
27−30
medium / 1080p
24−27
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 73% more, than Quadro P520.
high / 1080p
30−35
20−22
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
80−85
medium / 1080p
70−75
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 61% more, than Quadro P520.
high / 1080p
30−35
18−20
ultra / 1080p
24−27
14−16
QHD / 1440p
12−14
5−6
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
35−40
medium / 1080p
35−40
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Quadro P520.
low / 768p
100−110
70−75
medium / 768p
90−95
60−65
high / 1080p
40−45
21−24
ultra / 1080p
16−18
9−10
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 56% more, than Quadro P520.
high / 1080p
12−14
7−8
ultra / 1080p
10−11
5−6
4K / 2160p
2−3
1−2
low / 720p
35−40
21−24
medium / 1080p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 77% more, than Quadro P520.
low / 768p
120−130
100−110
ultra / 1080p
−
90−95
medium / 1080p
110−120
100−105
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 16% more, than Quadro P520.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
70−75
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Quadro P520.
high / 1080p
14−16
12−14
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
20−22
medium / 1080p
20−22
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than Quadro P520.
low / 768p
70−75
40−45
medium / 768p
45−50
24−27
high / 1080p
24−27
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
8−9
4K / 2160p
8−9
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 73% more, than Quadro P520.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
40−45
27−30
high / 768p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Quadro P520.
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M
Quadro P520
Architecture
GCN 3
Pascal
Code name
Tonga
Type
Mobile workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
27 May 2019
Pipelines
2048
384
Core clock speed
723 MHz
1303 MHz
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
Transistor count
5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
92.54
Floating-point performance
2,961 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
DirectX 12_1
Shader Model
6.3
OpenGL
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
Vulkan
1.2.131
+
Laptop size
large
large
Eyefinity
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
Check Price
