FirePro W7170M vs Radeon R7 A360
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W7170M and Radeon R7 A360. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W7170M and Radeon R7 A360. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R7 A360
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 A360 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A360.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R7 A360 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Radeon R7 A360 - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 A360 is 2 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon R7 A360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 4997 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7170M and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 542% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro W7170M and Radeon R7 A360 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 296% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 468% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 452% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 62% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 800% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 180% more, than Radeon R7 A360. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Radeon R7 A360 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | Meso |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 23.52 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3.6 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |