FirePro W7170M vs Radeon R9 M270X
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M270X. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M270X. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M270X
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 2 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 188% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 191% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 216% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 30% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 185% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 21 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 31.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | + |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |