FirePro W7170M vs Radeon R9 M360
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M360. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M360. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 M360
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M360 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M360 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Radeon R9 M360 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M360 is 177 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M360 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M360.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 136% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 103% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 137% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon R9 M360. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 M360 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | + |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 8 | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |