FirePro W7170M vs Radeon R9 M375X
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M375X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M375X.
Radeon R9 M375X
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M375X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 M375X - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Radeon R9 M375X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M375X is 202 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 M375X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 3875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M375X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 57% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 116% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 85% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than Radeon R9 M375X. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 M375X | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Tonga | Tropo |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1015 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 40.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,299 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | + |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |