FirePro W7170M vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2070
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 138% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 17% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 20% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7170M and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 17% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 23% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Tesla C2070. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2070. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | Fermi |
Code name | Tonga | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |