FirePro W7170M vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between FirePro W7170M and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7170M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 125% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M10 has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 310 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7170M and Tesla M10 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla M10. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Tonga | GM107 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |