FirePro W8000 vs Quadro M2000

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W8000 and Quadro M2000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W8000 stacks up against Quadro M2000, check out specs charts below.

FirePro W8000 Check Price

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	FirePro W8000	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI	4x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W8000 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W8000 and Quadro M2000 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W8000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 104 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000.
FirePro W8000 and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
FirePro W8000 is 78 mm longer, than Quadro M2000.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 1112 MHz higher, than FirePro W8000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
QHD / 1440p	4−5	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	21−24	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	24−27	27−30
QHD / 1440p	7−8	12−14
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
low / 720p	60−65	65−70
medium / 1080p	30−35	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	50−55	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro W8000 and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	220−230	230−240
medium / 768p	190−200	200−210
ultra / 1080p	100−110	120−130
QHD / 1440p	65−70	90−95
4K / 2160p	35−40	50−55
high / 768p	150−160	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	45−50	50−55
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	70−75	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	18−20	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	8−9
low / 720p	45−50	50−55
medium / 1080p	21−24	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 18% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p	27−30	30−35
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	110−120	120−130
medium / 1080p	60−65	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 12% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p	30−33	35−40
ultra / 1080p	21−24	27−30
QHD / 1440p	10−12	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	60−65	70−75
medium / 1080p	30−35	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p	95−100	100−110
medium / 768p	85−90	95−100
high / 1080p	35−40	40−45
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
QHD / 1440p	4−5	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 10% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p	10−12	12−14
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	2−3	3−4
low / 720p	35−40	40−45
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p	110−120	120−130
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro W8000.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	65−70	70−75
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than FirePro W8000.
high / 1080p	14−16	16−18
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	30−35	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 21% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p	65−70	75−80
medium / 768p	40−45	45−50
high / 1080p	21−24	24−27
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than FirePro W8000.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	40−45
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than FirePro W8000.

Full Specs

	FirePro W8000	Quadro M2000
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Tahiti	GM206
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	8 April 2016
Pipelines	1792	768
Core clock speed	900 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	55.82
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length	279 mm	201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	176 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	+
CUDA		5.2
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	391 Mh/s	215 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W8000 vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares