FirePro W8000 vs Quadro M620

When choosing between FirePro W8000 and Quadro M620, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W8000 and Quadro M620.

FirePro W8000 Check Price

Quadro M620 Check Price

Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro M620 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M620 here:

Quadro M620 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro W8000	Quadro M620
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	30 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W8000 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro M620.
FirePro W8000 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro M620.
FirePro W8000 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M620 - in Mobile workstations.
FirePro W8000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Quadro M620 - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of Quadro M620 is 118 MHz higher, than FirePro W8000.
FirePro W8000 and Quadro M620 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 488 MHz higher, than Quadro M620.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	4−5	3−4
low / 720p	35−40	30−35
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p	27−30	24−27
ultra / 1080p	24−27	20−22
QHD / 1440p	7−8	7−8
4K / 2160p	6−7	5−6
low / 720p	60−65	50−55
medium / 1080p	30−35	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	50−55	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	220−230	200−210
medium / 768p	190−200	170−180
ultra / 1080p	100−110	95−100
QHD / 1440p	65−70	50−55
4K / 2160p	35−40	30−33
high / 768p	150−160	130−140
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	110−120	100−110
medium / 768p	100−110	90−95
ultra / 1080p	70−75	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	18−20	16−18
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	6−7
low / 720p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p	27−30	24−27
ultra / 1080p	21−24	18−20
QHD / 1440p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	110−120	95−100
medium / 1080p	60−65	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Fortnite is 14% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p	30−33	24−27
ultra / 1080p	21−24	20−22
QHD / 1440p	10−12	8−9
low / 720p	60−65	50−55
medium / 1080p	30−35	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
medium / 768p	85−90	75−80
high / 1080p	35−40	27−30
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
QHD / 1440p	4−5	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p	10−12	9−10
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	14−16	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−110
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro M620.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	65−70	55−60
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
FirePro W8000 and Quadro M620 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	65−70	50−55
medium / 768p	40−45	30−35
high / 1080p	21−24	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−12
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Quadro M620.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	30−35
high / 768p	55−60	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M620 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than FirePro W8000.

Full Specs

	FirePro W8000	Quadro M620
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tahiti
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	14 June 2012	13 January 2017
Pipelines	1792	512
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1018 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops
Length	279 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	176 GB/s	80 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	391 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
Display Port		1.2
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+
3D Stereo		+
	Check Price	Check Price

FirePro W8000 vs Quadro M620

Quadro M620 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares