FirePro W8000 vs Radeon R7 M365X

In this comparison between FirePro W8000 and Radeon R7 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro W8000 Check Price

Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

	FirePro W8000	Radeon R7 M365X
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro W8000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
FirePro W8000 and Radeon R7 M365X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W8000 and Radeon R7 M365X are build with GCN 1.0 architecture.
Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
FirePro W8000 and Radeon R7 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 4500 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	16−18	0−1
ultra / 1080p	10−11	0−1
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	10−12
medium / 1080p	21−24	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	24−27	3−4
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	6−7	−
low / 720p	60−65	12−14
medium / 1080p	30−35	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	220−230	110−120
medium / 768p	190−200	85−90
ultra / 1080p	100−110	35−40
QHD / 1440p	65−70	−
4K / 2160p	35−40	10−11
high / 768p	150−160	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	60−65	70−75
ultra / 1080p	45−50	12−14
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	110−120	70−75
medium / 768p	100−110	40−45
ultra / 1080p	70−75	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	21−24	2−3
ultra / 1080p	18−20	2−3
QHD / 1440p	18−20	−
4K / 2160p	6−7	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	9−10
medium / 1080p	21−24	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	14−16	1−2
low / 720p	110−120	45−50
medium / 1080p	60−65	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	30−33	2−3
ultra / 1080p	21−24	−
QHD / 1440p	10−12	0−1
low / 720p	60−65	14−16
medium / 1080p	30−35	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	95−100	40−45
medium / 768p	85−90	−
high / 1080p	35−40	3−4
ultra / 1080p	14−16	2−3
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	10−12	1−2
ultra / 1080p	8−9	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	2−3
medium / 1080p	14−16	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	55−60
medium / 1080p	110−120	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	65−70	24−27
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	3−4
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	4−5
medium / 1080p	18−20	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	65−70	7−8
medium / 768p	40−45	6−7
high / 1080p	21−24	3−4
ultra / 1080p	12−14	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.
low / 768p	90−95	70−75
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	12−14
high / 768p	55−60	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 M365X.

Full Specs

	FirePro W8000	Radeon R7 M365X
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Code name	Tahiti	Litho
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	14 June 2012	5 May 2015
Pipelines	1792	384
Core clock speed	900 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		825 MHz
Transistor count	4,313 million	690 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	100.8	23.04
Floating-point performance	3,226 gflops	737.3 gflops
Length	279 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5500 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	176 GB/s	64 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	Not Listed
Vulkan	1.2.131
FreeSync		+
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	391 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
PowerTune		+
DualGraphics		+
ZeroCore		+
Switchable graphics		+
Mantle		+
Compute units		6
Form factor	full height / full length
StereoOutput3D	+
DisplayPort count	4
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro W8000 vs Radeon R7 M365X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares