FirePro W8000 vs Radeon R9 M275
When comparing FirePro W8000 and Radeon R9 M275, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W8000 and Radeon R9 M275 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8000
Radeon R9 M275
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W8000 and Radeon R9 M275 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
FirePro W8000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
FirePro W8000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 25 MHz higher, than FirePro W8000.
FirePro W8000 and Radeon R9 M275 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro W8000 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
0−1
ultra / 1080p
10−11
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 275% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
high / 1080p
27−30
5−6
ultra / 1080p
24−27
4−5
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
16−18
medium / 1080p
30−35
5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Battlefield 5 is 362% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
−
50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p
220−230
110−120
medium / 768p
190−200
90−95
ultra / 1080p
100−110
40−45
QHD / 1440p
65−70
24−27
4K / 2160p
35−40
18−20
high / 768p
150−160
65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 116% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
45−50
18−20
medium / 1080p
55−60
50−55
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p
110−120
70−75
medium / 768p
100−110
50−55
ultra / 1080p
70−75
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
high / 1080p
21−24
1−2
ultra / 1080p
18−20
−
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
0−1
low / 720p
45−50
10−12
medium / 1080p
21−24
3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
high / 1080p
27−30
9−10
ultra / 1080p
21−24
5−6
QHD / 1440p
14−16
1−2
low / 720p
110−120
50−55
medium / 1080p
60−65
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
high / 1080p
30−33
6−7
ultra / 1080p
21−24
4−5
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
low / 720p
60−65
18−20
medium / 1080p
30−35
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 311% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p
95−100
45−50
medium / 768p
85−90
−
high / 1080p
35−40
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
4−5
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
high / 1080p
10−12
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
1−2
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
7−8
medium / 1080p
14−16
4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
65−70
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
8−9
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p
65−70
16−18
medium / 768p
40−45
12−14
high / 1080p
21−24
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8000 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
Full Specs
FirePro W8000
Radeon R9 M275
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN
Code name
Tahiti
Venus
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
14 June 2012
1 August 2014
Pipelines
1792
640
Core clock speed
900 MHz
925 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
37.00
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
1,184 gflops
Length
279 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth
176 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.2.131
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
391 Mh/s
122 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Form factor
full height / full length
StereoOutput3D
+
DisplayPort count
4
Dual-link DVI support
+
Check Price
Check Price