FirePro M4000 vs FirePro W8100
When choosing between FirePro M4000 and FirePro W8100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M4000 and FirePro W8100.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | FirePro W8100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 220 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 566% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FirePro W8100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro W8100 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro W8100 - with GCN 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 224 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and FirePro W8100 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 500 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 331% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 229% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 190% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | FirePro W8100 | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Hawaii |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 23 June 2014 |
Pipelines | 512 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 824 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 6,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 131.8 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 4,219 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | n/a | PCIe 3.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | 466 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | full height / full length |
StereoOutput3D | + | + |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |