FirePro M5950 vs FirePro W8100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M5950 and FirePro W8100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M5950 and FirePro W8100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | FirePro W8100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 220 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 528% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FirePro W8100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and FirePro W8100 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and FirePro W8100 - with GCN 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 99 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and FirePro W8100 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 4100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 485% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 527% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| FirePro M5950 and FirePro W8100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 335% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 522% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 284% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | FirePro W8100 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Hawaii |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 23 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 824 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 6,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 131.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 4,219 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | n/a | PCIe 3.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | 466 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | full height / full length |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |