FirePro M6100 vs FirePro W8100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M6100 and FirePro W8100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M6100 and FirePro W8100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
FirePro M6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M6100 | FirePro W8100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M6100 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and FirePro W8100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than FirePro M6100.
- FirePro M6100 is used in Laptops, and FirePro W8100 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6100 is build with GCN architecture, and FirePro W8100 - with GCN 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 276 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro M6100 and FirePro W8100 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M6100 is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 213% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 86% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 55% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 175% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 152% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than FirePro M6100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M6100 | FirePro W8100 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | Bonaire | Hawaii |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 23 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 824 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 6,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 51.60 | 131.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,651 gflops | 4,219 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 196 Mh/s | 466 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |