FirePro W8100 vs GeForce 820A
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W8100 and GeForce 820A. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W8100 and GeForce 820A. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W8100
GeForce 820A
Main Specs
| FirePro W8100 | GeForce 820A | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
- FirePro W8100 has 1366% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 820A uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce 820A - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 49 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- FirePro W8100 and GeForce 820A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W8100 and GeForce 820A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro W8100 and GeForce 820A have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W8100 | GeForce 820A | |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | Hawaii | GF117 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 June 2014 | 17 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 6,200 million | 585 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 12.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
| Length | 279 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |