FirePro W8100 vs GeForce 920A
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and GeForce 920A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce 920A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
GeForce 920A
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce 920A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
- FirePro W8100 has 566% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce 920A uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce 920A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce 920A - with Kepler 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920A is 130 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and GeForce 920A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and GeForce 920A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
FirePro W8100 and GeForce 920A have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce 920A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 920A. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce 920A | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Hawaii | GK208B |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 954 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 30.53 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 441.6 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.5 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |