FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 285M SLI, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W8100 stacks up against GeForce GTX 285M SLI, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 46% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FirePro W8100 has 6 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 248 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 285M SLI - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 3980 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 175% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 285M SLI | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | G9x |
Code name | Hawaii | N10E-GTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 576 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1508 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1020 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 |
Shader Model | 6.3 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Quadro P2000
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon HD 6990M
- FirePro W8100 vs FireStream 9370
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Radeon HD 6990M
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs FireStream 9370