FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and GeForce GTX 460 v2 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 460 v2 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 160 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
- FirePro W8100 has 37% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 45 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 v2 - by 40 nm process technology.
- FirePro W8100 is 69 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 992 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 215% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 261% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 191% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 152% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | GeForce GTX 460 v2 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Hawaii | GF114 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 24 September 2011 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 336 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 779 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 43.62 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 1,045.6 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | 210 mm |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 96.19 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 75 Mh/s |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro P2000
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M